Legal experts stunned by Jerry Sandusky’s interview with Bob Costas

Legal experts stunned by Jerry Sandusky’s interview with Bob Costas.

The above link references The Philadelphia Inquirer’s story in which the reporter interviewed various defense attorneys about Jerry Sandusky’s recent interview with NBC’s Bob Costas. My reaction is similar to the ones expressed in the article. Child sex abuse charges are very serious. The general public doesn’t take allegations very lightly. You shouldn’t open yourself up to questioning until you are ready to prove your innocence in the court of public opinion and have the blessing of your legal defense team. Sandusky had no control of the interview and failed to defend himself. As one attorney stated, this interview is a “prosecutor’s dream.”

Tips for Journalists-Turned-Publicists, From Other Publicists – PRNewser

Tips for Journalists-Turned-Publicists, From Other Publicists – PRNewser.

Good advice for journalists who are interested in public relations.

Television Station Found Guilty of Malice: $1 Million Verdict

KSTP hit with $1 million defamation verdict

A holistic healer said she was defamed by a 2009 news story.

St. Paul, MN, Wednesday, June 4, 2003 — The illuminated red letters of KSTP studios light up the Hubbard Broadcasting building at 3415 University Ave, in St. Paul.

CameraA Dakota County jury has awarded a holistic healer from Hudson, Wis., $1 million in compensatory damages from KSTP-TV for a March 2009 story it aired about her treatment of a patient, attorneys for both sides said Monday night.

The jury’s award is believed to be the largest verdict ever in a Minnesota defamation lawsuit.

Jurors made the award Friday after a weeklong trial before District Judge Richard Spicer, and returned Monday to deliberate on punitive damages. They declined to issue a punitive award.

Attorney Paul Hannah, who represented KSTP, said he based his argument against punitive damages on the fact that the $1 million compensatory award was the largest in state history for such a case and therefore sufficient punishment for the broadcaster.

“I believe that to be the case, that this is the largest,” said Hannah, a prominent Minneapolis media law attorney who expects that KSTP, Channel 5 in the Twin Cities, will appeal the verdict and file motions to get it reduced or overturned.

The lawsuit also named as defendants Cheryl and Eric Blaha, former patients of the holistic healer, but the jury found that they were not liable for monetary damages.

The gist of KSTP’s story was that Susan Anderson, then known as Susan Wahl, a Hudson doctor of naturopathy, had “de-prescribed” anti-anxiety medication to Cheryl Blaha. Cheryl Blaha then claimed to KSTP in interviews that she had tried to commit suicide as a result of being weaned from the medicine by Anderson.

The story was reported by KSTP’s Jennifer Griswold, who declined to comment Monday night when reached by phone, saying any reaction would have to come from Hannah. Hannah said he is not sure whether KSTP plans to issue any statement regarding the verdict.

Naturopathy is an alternative medicine based on the belief that vital energy or vital forces help the body regulate such things as metabolism, reproduction and growth.

In her suit, Anderson claimed medical records indicated that Blaha’s own medical doctor had reduced the medication and that there was no proof of the alleged suicide attempt, said Patrick Tierney, Anderson’s lawyer.

“That was certainly the heart of it,” Tierney said Monday night. “KSTP bought [Blaha's story] hook, line and sinker, and that’s what this case was about.”

Jury found ‘actual malice’

Tierney said he has handled other defamation cases that resulted in verdicts in the high six figures, but none as large as the one against KSTP.

“It’s significant,” he said, noting that the jury found “actual malice” in its verdict against KSTP, which he said would make it almost impossible for the award to be overturned or reduced.

But Hannah said he will file motions in coming weeks attempting to do just that. He would not elaborate, but the possible grounds for making such post-verdict motions are that the instructions to the jury regarding the law were incorrect or that the facts did not merit such a high award.

Anderson, in a memorandum in support of the suit, claimed KSTP “knew that the story … was false,” as evidenced by pages and pages of medical records dating back to 2007.

Tierney stated that a week after the alleged suicide attempt, the woman met with her doctor “and never mentioned any suicide attempt.”

He said the same records also indicate that KSTP knew the claim that Blaha’s doctor did not know Blaha was weaning herself from the anti-anxiety medication was false.

Tierney said the jury awarded Anderson about $100,000 for lost earnings, past and future, and $900,000 for damage to her reputation as a result of the broadcast story.

KSTP “created a report instead of reporting on something,” he said.

Minneapolis media attorney John Borger said that, although he could not say with absolute certainty that the $1 million verdict is the highest in state history, he could not think of a higher one.

Tierney, Hannah and Borger all said they know of awards in the $700,000 range, but nothing to equal this one.

“If this is not the highest, it’s certainly right up there,” Borger said.

Heron Marquez • 952-746-3281

Anderson Cooper’s Daytime Disaster

Anderson Cooper’s Daytime Disaster (Full Story)

It’s just three weeks into Anderson Cooper’s new daytime adventure, and the show has already devolved into the sort of unscrupulous talk-show tactics that Cooper’s prime-time newsman personality would turn up his nose at: A teenager is in a coma after one of Anderson‘s producers encouraged him to record his reckless behavior for a show on the “teenage mind.”

Details are sketchy, but we hear the show booked a teenager to appear on a show about how the adolescent mind works. In advance of his appearance, a source says, a producer “encouraged [the] kid to go out and ‘film the crazy stuff you do.’” In the course of following those instructions, the teen filmed himself skateboarding adventurously and fell, sustaining a severe head injury. We are told he is comatose, and that Cooper is “distraught.” The show never aired.

NBC Miami Adds 4 Hours of Weekend News

NBC Miami Adds 4 Hours of Weekend News.

Why Do Some Television Stations Get Great Publicity?

A Kansas City communications company does an interesting analysis discussing why a top television station earns a tremendous amount of valuable news coverage while other television stations ironically shy away from the press.

===========

09-13-2011
WHY DOES KMBC RECEIVE SO MUCH PUBLICITY:  IT DESERVES IT!
http://www.bottomlinecom.com/kcnews/kmbcdeservespositivepr.html

The jump from journalism to PR: 7 things to consider | LinkedIn

The jump from journalism to PR: 7 things to consider

The recent Burson Marsteller “whispergate” mess got me thinking about the long-lived, symbiotic relationship between people who work in PR and those who make their living in journalism.

The two PR pros who tried to seed negative stories about Google on behalf of a not-so-secret client (Facebook) were former reporters who had only recently moved to the dark side.

Some expressed surprise that ex-journalists weren’t more skillful in their media relations, while others chalked it up to different sensibilities. But our industry is growing, and a portion of our swelling numbers is coming from former media types.

So, do journalists really make the best PR people?

Read the article here:

 

Reporters Committee For Freedom of the Press: Filming police in public is protected by the First Amendment

Filming police in public is protected by the First Amendment

Filming police in public is protected by the First Amendment

The right to film police in the performance of their public duties in a public space is a “basic, vital, and well-established liberty safeguarded by the First Amendment,” a federal appellate court held last week, marking a major victory in a time when arrests for such activities have been on the rise.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in Boston (1st Cir.) ruled on Friday that three Boston police officers are not immune from liability for arresting a man who, believing the officers were using excessive force to arrest a young man on the Boston Common, recorded the October 2007 scene on his cell phone. The officers arrested the spectator, Simon Glik, confiscated his cell phone and a computer flash drive and charged him with violation of the Massachusetts wiretap statute, which requires the consent of all parties to record a conversation. The state Supreme Court has interpreted the statute to criminalize only secret recordings made without such consent.

Because the officers admitted that Glik used his cell phone openly and in plain view to obtain the video and audio recording, the Boston Municipal Court dismissed the wiretap charge against him. Glik filed a civil rights action against the officers and the city for alleged violations of his First and Fourth Amendment rights.

The officers moved to dismiss the complaint, claiming they were entitled to qualified immunity on the charges because it is not well-settled that Glik had a constitutional right to record the officers.

The lower court denied the motion, stating that in the federal appellate court with jurisdiction over federal trial courts in Massachusetts, “this First Amendment right publicly to record the activities of police officers on public business is established.” (The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press joined a friend-of-the-court brief in support of Glik, although the appellate court declined to consider the brief in evaluating the case.)

The appellate court affirmed the denial, allowing Glik to pursue his claims against the officers.

“It is firmly established that the First Amendment’s aegis extends further than the text’s proscription on laws ‘abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press,’ and encompasses a range of conduct related to the gathering and dissemination of information,” the court said. “The filming of government officials engaged in their duties in a public place, including police officers performing their responsibilities, fits comfortably within these principles. Gathering information about government officials in a form that can readily be disseminated to others serves a cardinal First Amendment interest in protecting and promoting ‘the free discussion of governmental affairs.’”

This right to gather and disseminate news is not one that belongs solely to the media, a particularly important principle in this modern era of the news industry, when “changes in technology and society have made the lines between private citizen and journalist exceedingly difficult to draw,” the court said.

“The proliferation of electronic devices with video-recording capability means that many of our images of current events come from bystanders with a ready cell phone or digital camera rather than a traditional film crew, and news stories are now just as likely to be broken by a blogger at her computer as a reporter at a major newspaper. Such developments make clear why the news-gathering protections of the First Amendment cannot turn on professional credentials or status.”

Indeed, most Americans’ ability to effortlessly capture and distribute digital images, including in increasing numbers the activities of on-duty police officers without their consent, has spawned an increase in the number of arrests for violation of local and state wiretapping and eavesdropping laws and other offenses, such as disturbing the peace, media advocates say.

In late July, for example, the Suffolk County police on Long Island, New York, arrested freelance photojournalist Phil Datz and charged him with obstruction of governmental administration after he filmed officers on the side of the road arresting suspects who had allegedly led officers on a police chase in Bohemia. The department later dropped the charges.

And on Memorial Day, Miami Beach police allegedly confiscated video-recording equipment from at least one member of the public and a TV photojournalist after both witnessed officers fatally shoot a suspect on a public street.

Kristen Rasmussen, 6:27 pm

Copyright 2011 The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Elizabeth Smart to Join ‘Good Morning America,’ ABC News – The Daily Beast

Elizabeth Smart to Join ‘Good Morning America,’ ABC News – The Daily Beast.

PlayStation Network Outage: Unanswered Questions – PS3 Feature at IGN

PSN Outage: Unanswered Questions – PS3 Feature at IGN (link to IGN full article)

PSN Outage: Unanswered Questions

Sony has very little to say about PSN’s outage, and that’s not okay.

April 25, 2011

As you no doubt know by now, the PlayStation Network is out of commission. Worse yet, Sony’s handling on the PR side of the outage has left us wanting.

The basic mentality is this: another day, another vague update on the PlayStation Blog.

As a PlayStation 3 gamer, this outage has affected my gaming routine in a serious way. The hours and hours I spend on PS3 and the PlayStation Network week after week has grinded to a halt, as it has for millions of gamers around the world. But what many PS3 gamers fail to realize is that we’re owed answers. We’re consumers, we purchased a console with the promise of access to a free online service, and it’s not been there for a prolonged period of time.

So if there are five questions in particular every PlayStation Network user needs information on, it’s these. We’ve reached out to Sony for answers, but so far, no word.

1. What’s the status of your credit card information? How about other personal information?
These are the most obvious questions that will affect the greatest amount of people. Your credit card number, your address and other information is saved on your PlayStation 3 and the PlayStation Network. Is this information secure? Has it been compromised? Should people be worried?

The fact that these questions haven’t been answered five days into the outage raises serious concerns.

2. How will PlayStation Plus subscribers be compensated? How about those with subscriptions to games like Free Realms and DC Universe Online? What about those with subscriptions to NHL GameCenter and MLB.tv?

I wasn’t only a day one adopter of PlayStation Plus, I was in on the fun in the first hour. It’s a great service that I’ve defended time and time again, from Twitter to Podcast Beyond, and even in the many stories Greg and I have written about the service over the past year.

But unlike standard PSN access, PlayStation Plus isn’t free. Obviously, an outage of, say, a week only warrants a minute amount of money returned to the consumer. Yet, there are fleeting deals, discounts and the like that PS+ users — the most loyal Sony customers there are — can’t take advantage of. And that’s a problem.

And then there are the games and services tied to PlayStation Network that can’t be used without it. DCUO is a game you pay to play, and it’s exclusively online. Free Realms has memberships that can cost quite a bit, and yet there’s no way for you to play this MMO right now. The NHL playoffs are in full swing, and people downloaded the GameCenter program to tie their NHL.com accounts to it. MLB.tv is an expensive service that can’t be utilized via the PS3, and baseball season is just beginning.

How will all of these people be reimbursed for lost time and accessibility of services they paid for? And when?

3. What caused the outage, anyway?

This is probably something that Sony can answer after everything has been fixed, but since so many millions of people rely on PlayStation Network for their gaming fix, players are no doubt owed an explanation of what the problem was.

Pulling the plug on the PSN doesn’t bode well for how deep and severe the problem is. There are a lot of unsubstantiated rumors floating around the Internet about what happened and what forced Sony to take some drastic actions. But we want to hear information straight from Sony. What caused this outage, and how could something so severe happen to a service so important to their tens upon tens of millions of customers?

You want to play Portal 2 online? Too bad.
4. What’s the timetable for getting the PlayStation Network up and running?
PS3 gamers are extremely anxious to get back onto the PlayStation Network. There are games to purchase, Trophies to sync, and titles to play online.

With that said, when is the PSN going to be fixed? When the outage first happened, we were told a day or two. That was three days ago. A date and time isn’t necessary if there really isn’t one. But just be honest and tell us so. If this is going to be a prolonged problem, we deserve to know. If Sony is right around the corner from solving it, however, we should be told so.

5. Will the PSN be put back up in fragments? Will there be workarounds to get game servers back up?
Engineering talk aside, there are probably problems with certain parts of the PlayStation Network but not the entire thing. With new games having just come out like SOCOM 4, Portal 2 and Mortal Kombat, there are a plethora of eager gamers waiting to get online and play. So even if the PlayStation Store remains down, and we’re unable to download new games for awhile, will servers eventually come back online to accommodate online play?